Nov
10

NYSE TICK Action Not Keeping Up With Price

By on Tuesday, November 10th, 2009 at 9:00 pm

TICKscore closed at -5 Tuesday, leaving intact a major divergence between cumulative TICKscore and price. NYSE TICK action hasn’t been particularly strong during this recent run-up, especially in light of the extremely negative action in late October. If recent price action wasn’t so strong, this would be a major concern. As it stands, I will defer to price but expect a choppy, difficult rally rather than smooth sailing.

The Nasdaq100 posted a NR10 day, meaning it was the narrowest range day of the past ten sessions. That’s a potentially positive sign considering the narrow range was accompanied by lopsided negative breadth (2:1 on the NASDAQ).  This has only occurred thirteen times since 1990, eleven of which led to a higher Nasdaq three sessions later…

Nasdaq NR10 Day & 2:1 Negative Breadth
11/10/09… Nasdaq ??? three sessions later
08/31/09… Nasdaq -1.2% three sessions later
03/27/09… Nasdaq +0.1% three sessions later
10/27/08… Nasdaq +14.0% three sessions later
05/23/08… Nasdaq +3.1% three sessions later
08/11/06… Nasdaq +5.6% three sessions later
07/21/06… Nasdaq +2.5% three sessions later
10/18/05… Nasdaq +1.7% three sessions later
05/10/04… Nasdaq +1.4% three sessions later
04/06/04… Nasdaq +0.2% three sessions later
12/13/02… Nasdaq +0.8% three sessions later
09/05/02… Nasdaq +7.3% three sessions later
08/03/98… Nasdaq -0.2% three sessions later
01/21/92… Nasdaq +5.3% three sessions later

One short-term negative sign was Tuesday’s contraction in new 52-week highs and expansion in new 52-week lows on both the NYSE and NASDAQ. That’s a fairly unusual development given that the NDX posted a higher high, higher low and higher close. This hints at underlying weakness not evident on the surface, and has usually led to a lower Nasdaq close within the next few sessions…

New Highs Contract, New Lows Expand on NDX Rally Day
11/10/09… ???
08/25/09… Lower NDX close one session later
04/03/09… Lower NDX close one session later
03/17/09… Lower NDX close three sessions later
11/04/08… Lower NDX close one session later
06/04/08… Lower NDX close two sessions later
04/21/08… Lower NDX close one session later
04/10/08… Lower NDX close one session later
10/18/07… Lower NDX close one session later
09/24/07… No lower close within three sessions
04/17/07… Lower NDX close one session later
02/21/07… Lower NDX close three sessions later
11/08/06… Lower NDX close one session later
09/14/06… Lower NDX close three sessions later
05/08/06… Lower NDX close one session later
07/15/05… Lower NDX close one session later
05/24/05… Lower NDX close one session later
05/06/05… Lower NDX close two sessions later
02/08/05… Lower NDX close one session later
09/04/03… Lower NDX close one session later
07/30/02… Lower NDX close one session later
03/08/02… Lower NDX close one session later
06/07/01… Lower NDX close one session later
08/15/00… Lower NDX close one session later
07/17/00… Lower NDX close one session later
11/10/99… No lower close within three sessions
08/24/99… Lower NDX close three sessions later
01/07/99… Lower NDX close three sessions later
11/10/98… Lower NDX close two sessions later
07/13/98… Lower NDX close one session later
07/07/98… No lower close within three sessions

Note that out of the past 30 occurrences, 27 led to a lower NDX close within the next three sessions. That 90% win rate is significantly above the 67% at-any-time odds for a lower NDX close (below the setup day) within three days.

Considering the ‘Gap & Go’ price pattern triggered by S&P futures (see intraday update), I would look upon any pullback on Wednesday as a buying opportunity.

Copyright Notice

Copyright 2012 Astrikos LLC. This publication is for the benefit of subscribers only and is not to be summarized, reproduced, or rebroadcast in any fashion without our written permission.

Market Tells is on Twitter!


Disclaimer

Comments, data and trading signals herein are for informational purposes only and are not recommendations to buy or sell. All information presented is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed.