Sep
09

Gap & Go Price Pattern, Plus Why September is a Pivotal Month

By on Wednesday, September 9th, 2009 at 9:36 pm

Breadth settled 2:1 positive for a fourth consecutive session Wednesday. This is only the tenth time since 1990 that we’ve seen three consecutive days of 2:1+ positive breadth. In eight of those ten cases, the S&P was higher two sessions later, suggesting the S&P will hold above 1025 on Thursday. New 52-week highs declined (just barely) from Tuesday, triggering the three-day sell setup discussed earlier today. We also settled at a fresh six-month high, suggesting range-bound trade on Thursday. While those studies point to choppy trade over the next few sessions, a price pattern on the S&P futures chart is pointing to a close above today’s settlement on Friday. Note that the S&Ps posted a higher high, higher low and a higher close on the heels of Tuesday’s unfilled upside gap. This ‘gap and go’ pattern is typically a bullish indication looking out two trading days, which makes sense considering that a rally day immediately after an upside gap suggests bullish momentum remains intact. The last thirty times that the front-month S&P contract posted a higher high, low and close immediately after an unfilled upside gap are listed in the table below…

S&P Futures Post Higher High, Low & Close After Upside Gap
09/09/09… S&P futures ??? two sessions later
07/16/09… S&P futures +1.4% two sessions later
06/02/09… S&P futures -0.2% two sessions later
05/05/09… S&P futures +0.4% two  sessions later
04/13/09… S&P futures -0.6% two sessions later
11/25/08… S&P futures +4.9% two sessions later
04/17/08… S&P futures +1.2% two sessions later
04/02/08… S&P futures +0.1% two sessions later
12/24/07… S&P futures -1.1% two sessions later
12/06/07… S&P futures +0.8% two sessions later
11/29/07… S&P futures +0.3% two sessions later
07/13/07… S&P futures -0.1% two sessions later
04/17/07… S&P futures +0.1% two sessions later
02/15/07… S&P futures +0.2% two sessions later
11/30/06… S&P futures +0.6% two sessions later
08/17/06… S&P futures +0.1% two sessions later
11/18/05… S&P futures +1.0% two sessions later
05/27/05… S&P futures +0.1% two sessions later
05/19/05… S&P futures +0.4% two sessions later
02/01/05… S&P futures +0.0% two sessions later
10/04/04… S&P futures +0.6% two sessions later
04/05/04… S&P futures -0.5% two sessions later
11/25/03… S&P futures +0.4% two sessions later
03/14/03… S&P futures +4.0% two sessions later
01/03/03… S&P futures +1.5% two sessions later
11/15/02… S&P futures -1.2% two  sessions later
10/14/02… S&P futures +2.5% two sessions later
07/30/02… S&P futures -2.4% two  sessions later
06/18/02… S&P futures -3.6% two  sessions later
11/14/01… S&P futures -0.3% two sessions later
09/25/01… S&P futures +0.4% two sessions later

Note that in 21 out of 30 occurrences, or 70% of the time, the S&Ps were trading higher two sessions later, well above the 52% random odds of a higher S&P two days later.

With the S&P currently up 1%+ for the month, now’s a good time to remember that September is a pivotal month in terms of how the market performs in the final quarter. When the S&P fails to rally in September, it sets up the potential for some ugly finishes to the year. That was the case last year, as well as during the 2000-2002 decline, the ’87 crash and throughout most of the 70′s trading range. But when the market rallies in September, it tells you that in all likelihood, a classic year-end rally is forthcoming. Consider that an ‘up September’ has a strong track record at calling for a subsequently higher monthly close by the end of the year. Going all the way back to 1950, there have been 26 years in which the S&P500 closed out the month of September with a gain (see table below.) In 24 out of 26 years, the S&P proceeded to post a subsequently higher close within the next three months, and typically within 1-2 months. In only one year out of 26 did the S&P lose any substantial ground…

When the S&P500 Rallies in September
09/28/07… S&P500 +1.5% one month later
09/29/06… S&P500 +3.2% one month later
09/30/05… S&P500 +1.7% two months later
09/30/04… S&P500 +1.4% one month later
09/30/98… S&P500 +8.0% one month later
09/30/97… S&P500 +0.1% two months later
09/30/96… S&P500 +2.6% one month later
09/29/95… S&P500 +3.6% two months later
09/30/92… S&P500 +0.2% one month later
09/30/88… S&P500 +2.6% one month later
09/30/83… S&P500 +0.2% two months later
09/30/82… S&P500 +11.0% one month later
09/30/80… S&P500 +1.6% one month later
09/30/76… S&P500 +2.1% three months later
09/28/73… S&P500 -10.0% three months later (*)
09/30/70… S&P500 +3.4% two months later
09/30/68… S&P500 +0.7% one month later
09/29/67… S&P500 -0.3% three months later
09/30/65… S&P500 +2.7% one month later
09/30/64… S&P500 +0.8% one month later
09/30/58… S&P500 +2.5% one month later
09/28/56… S&P500 +0.5% one month later
09/30/55… S&P500 +4.2% two months later
09/30/54… S&P500 +6.0% two months later
09/30/53… S&P500 +5.1% one month later
09/29/50… S&P500 +0.4% one month later

This same setup can also be utilized in a slightly longer-term format by simply looking at how the S&P performed over the next three months (until the end of the year.) This has more telling implications for the market’s long-term performance as it tells you if the gains are typically sustainable through year-end. As the table below illustrates, the gains are indeed sustainable in the majority of cases. Again looking at the twenty-six years since 1950 in which the S&P rallied in September, we find that the S&P was trading at an even higher level at the end of the year in every case but four. And in two out of the four years the S&P failed to settle higher at year-end, it was down less than 1% compared with its September settlement. So really, there were only two years out of twenty-six in which an ‘up September’ truly failed to lead to any end-of-year strength…

When the S&P500 Rallies in September
09/28/07… S&P500 -3.8% at year-end (*)
09/29/06… S&P500 +6.2% at year-end
09/30/05… S&P500 +1.6% at year-end
09/30/04… S&P500 +8.7% at year-end
09/30/98… S&P500 +20.9% at year-end
09/30/97… S&P500 +2.4% at year-end
09/30/96… S&P500 +7.8% at year-end
09/29/95… S&P500 +5.4% at year-end
09/30/92… S&P500 +4.3% at year-end
09/30/88… S&P500 +2.1% at year-end
09/30/83… S&P500 -0.7% at year-end
09/30/82… S&P500 +16.8% at year-end
09/30/80… S&P500 +8.2% at year-end
09/30/76… S&P500 +2.1% at year-end
09/28/73… S&P500 -10.0% at year-end (*)
09/30/70… S&P500 +9.3% at year-end
09/30/68… S&P500 +1.2% at year-end
09/29/67… S&P500 -0.3% at year-end
09/30/65… S&P500 +2.8% at year-end
09/30/64… S&P500 +0.7% at year-end
09/30/58… S&P500 +10.3% at year-end
09/28/56… S&P500 +2.9% at year-end
09/30/55… S&P500 +4.1% at year-end
09/30/54… S&P500 +11.4% at year-end
09/30/53… S&P500 +6.3% at year-end
09/29/50… S&P500 +4.9% at year-end

Copyright Notice

Copyright 2012 Astrikos LLC. This publication is for the benefit of subscribers only and is not to be summarized, reproduced, or rebroadcast in any fashion without our written permission.

Market Tells is on Twitter!


Disclaimer

Comments, data and trading signals herein are for informational purposes only and are not recommendations to buy or sell. All information presented is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed.