Feb
19

A Spark of Fear

By on Thursday, February 19th, 2009 at 10:25 pm

Another relatively tame close masked aggressive institutional selling beneath the surface. TICKscore settled at -64, Cumulative TICK -107,000. Breadth closed 2:1 negative for the third consecutive session. The relentless selling seems to have finally sparked a bit of fear among speculators. Note that the Nasdaq/NYSE Volume Ratio closed at its lowest level of the month at 1.36, and that the CBOE Equity Put/Call Ratio closed above .90, the second time in the last three days we’ve seen a reading over .90. As I recently noted in my January 14th column, three straight readings over .90 has typically led to a rally over the next couple of days given the heightened level of fear. We didn’t quite see three readings over .90 this week, but it was close.

Semiconductors underperformed in a big way Thursday, nearly tripling the percentage loss for the Nasdaq100. It missed by the slimmest of margins (.07%), but this type of extreme underperformance by the SOX has generally been a short-term negative sign. See my December 18th column for details.

While the SOX action hints at the potential for another lower close, it’s hard not to look for a short-term rally to unfold given the combination of technically oversold conditions and the spark of fear mentioned earlier. The 2-day RSI for the S&P500 settled right on the 2.0 mark Thursday, triggering a short-term buy signal. The table below lists each of the last thirty instances in which the S&P’s 2-day RSI closed at or below 2.0, along with the performance of the S&P500 by the time the RSI rose back over 2.0 and the number of days elapsed…

S&P500 2-day RSI Closes <=2.0
02/19/09… S&P500 ??? when 2day RSI >2
10/08/08… S&P500 +1.9% when 2day RSI >2 (three sessions)
01/22/08… S&P500 +2.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/04/08… S&P500 +0.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
02/27/07… S&P500 +0.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
06/13/06… S&P500 +0.5% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
06/27/05… S&P500 +0.9% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/04/05… S&P500 -0.0% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
08/06/04… S&P500 +0.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
03/11/04… S&P500 +1.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/22/03… S&P500 +1.0% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
09/19/02… S&P500 +0.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
09/03/02… S&P500 +1.8% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
07/22/02… S&P500 +3.0% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
04/26/02… S&P500 +0.1% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
09/20/01… S&P500 +2.0% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
09/07/01… S&P500 +0.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
06/15/01… S&P500 -0.1% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
02/09/01… S&P500 +1.2% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
11/10/00… S&P500 +1.3% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
10/11/00… S&P500 +0.8% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
09/18/00… S&P500 +1.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
04/14/00… S&P500 +3.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/24/00… S&P500 +0.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
10/15/99… S&P500 +0.5% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
08/04/99… S&P500 +0.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
05/25/99… S&P500 +1.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
04/19/99… S&P500 +1.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
08/31/98… S&P500 +3.8% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
07/23/98… S&P500 +0.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/09/98… S&P500 +1.2% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)

Note that in 27 out of 30 cases, or 90% of the time, the S&P posted a subsequently higher close one or two sessions later. That’s significantly greater than the 65% at-any-time odds of a higher close within the next two days. Also note that the worst loss in 29 out of the last 30 cases was only 0.1%, suggesting limited downside potential over the short-term.

Another short-term positive sign was the contraction in new 52-week lows on Thursday despite the S&P falling to a fresh two-month low. Historically, new 52-week lows will expand roughly 9 out of 10 times when the S&P hits a one-month low. When this doesn’t occur, it’s generally a positive sign for the short-term. The table below lists each of the last thirty occurrences, along with the performance of the S&P500 over the next 2-3 trading days. Note that in 27 out of 30 cases, the drop in new lows ultimately led to a higher S&P two or three sessions later. That 90% win rate is significantly better than the 63% at-any-time odds of a higher SPX close 2-3 sessions later…

S&P500 Hits One-Month Low on a Drop in New 52-week Lows
02/19/09… S&P500 ???
01/21/09… S&P500 -0.4% three sessions later
11/21/08… S&P500 +7.2% two sessions later
10/09/08… S&P500 +10.3% two sessions later
10/07/08… S&P500 -9.7% three sessions later
09/17/08… S&P500 +8.5% two sessions later
07/14/08… S&P500 +1.4% two sessions later
06/19/08… S&P500 -2.1% three sessions later
06/12/08… S&P500 +1.5% two sessions later
06/03/08… S&P500 +1.9% two sessions later
05/27/08… S&P500 +0.9% two sessions later
01/23/08… S&P500 +1.2% three sessions later
01/07/08… S&P500 +0.3% three sessions later
11/21/07… S&P500 +0.8% three sessions later
11/09/07… S&P500 +1.9% two sessions later
07/31/07… S&P500 +1.2% two sessions later
07/27/07… S&P500 +0.5% three sessions later
06/08/07… S&P500 +0.5% three sessions later
06/14/06… S&P500 +1.8% two sessions later
05/18/06… S&P500 +0.0% two sessions later
01/03/06… S&P500 +0.4% two sessions later
08/30/05… S&P500 +1.1% two sessions later
08/24/05… S&P500 +0.2% three sessions later
04/18/05… S&P500 +1.2% three sessions later
08/13/04… S&P500 +1.6% two sessions later
07/23/04… S&P500 +0.8% two sessions later
07/15/04… S&P500 +0.2% three sessions later
09/29/03… S&P500 +1.2% two sessions later
08/05/03… S&P500 +0.9% two sessions later
12/31/02… S&P500 +3.3% two sessions later
10/10/02… S&P500 +4.7% two sessions later

Copyright Notice

Copyright 2012 Astrikos LLC. This publication is for the benefit of subscribers only and is not to be summarized, reproduced, or rebroadcast in any fashion without our written permission.

Market Tells is on Twitter!


Disclaimer

Comments, data and trading signals herein are for informational purposes only and are not recommendations to buy or sell. All information presented is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed.