Oct
08

S&P500 2-day RSI Closes Below 2.0

By on Wednesday, October 8th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
In my March 10th column I discussed the short-term bullish implications of a
2-period RSI for the Dow Industrials closing below 2.0. Not only did we see
that occur today, but the 2-day RSI for the S&P500 also settled under 2.0,
triggering an even more reliable short-term buy. The table below lists each of
the last thirty instances in which the S&P's 2-day RSI closed under 2.0, along
with the performance of the S&P500 by the time the RSI rose back over 2.0 and
the number of days elapsed...

S&P500 2-day RSI Closes Below 2.0
10/08/08... S&P500 ??? when 2day RSI >2
01/22/08... S&P500 +2.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/04/08... S&P500 +0.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
02/27/07... S&P500 +0.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
06/13/06... S&P500 +0.5% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/04/05... S&P500 -0.0% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
08/06/04... S&P500 +0.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
03/11/04... S&P500 +1.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/22/03... S&P500 +1.0% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
09/19/02... S&P500 +0.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
09/03/02... S&P500 +1.8% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
07/22/02... S&P500 +3.0% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
04/26/02... S&P500 +0.1% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
09/20/01... S&P500 +2.0% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
09/07/01... S&P500 +0.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
06/15/01... S&P500 -0.1% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
02/09/01... S&P500 +1.2% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
11/10/00... S&P500 +1.3% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
10/11/00... S&P500 +0.8% when 2day RSI >2 (two sessions)
09/18/00... S&P500 +1.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
04/14/00... S&P500 +3.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
10/15/99... S&P500 +0.5% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
08/04/99... S&P500 +0.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
05/25/99... S&P500 +1.6% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
04/19/99... S&P500 +1.3% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
08/31/98... S&P500 +3.8% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
07/23/98... S&P500 +0.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
01/09/98... S&P500 +1.2% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
10/27/97... S&P500 +5.1% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
12/06/96... S&P500 +1.4% when 2day RSI >2 (one session)
06/17/96... S&P500 -0.5% when 2day RSI >2 (three sessions)

Note that in 27 out of 30 cases, or 90% of the time, the S&P posted a
subsequently higher close one or two sessions later. Also note that the worst
loss in 29 out of the last 30 cases was a mere 0.1%, suggesting limited
downside potential over the short-term.

In Tuesday's column I noted the short-term bullish implications of five
consecutive lower closes for the S&P cash index. While that setup failed to
lead to a higher close today, it's noteworthy that S&P futures have now
triggered the same pattern as of Wednesday's close. The reasoning is that the
futures managed a small gain back on October 1st, which makes Wednesday the
first time we've seen five straight down days for S&P futures since January.
And it's noteworthy that the likelihood of short-term strength is even more
apparent after five down days for the futures. The last thirty times that the
front-month contract initially closed down five days in a row are listed in
the table below. Note that in 29 out of 30 cases, or better than 95% of the
time, the S&Ps posted a higher close (above the setup day's close) within the
next two sessions. That's significantly better than the 65% at-any-time odds
for a higher close within two days...

S&P Futures Settle Lower Five Days in a Row
10/08/08... ???
01/22/08... Higher close one session later
02/27/07... Higher close one session later
06/09/06... No higher close within two sessions
01/05/05... Higher close one session later
02/24/04... Higher close one session later
01/22/03... Higher close one session later
12/05/02... Higher close one session later
04/05/02... Higher close one session later
02/07/02... Higher close one session later
09/21/01... Higher close one session later
06/14/01... Higher close one session later
11/13/00... Higher close one session later
10/12/00... Higher close one session later
05/23/00... Higher close one session later
04/14/00... Higher close one session later
09/24/99... Higher close one session later
07/23/99... Higher close two sessions later
04/19/99... Higher close one session later
07/24/98... Higher close one session later
02/29/96... Higher close one session later
02/20/96... Higher close one session later
09/07/94... Higher close one session later
05/09/94... Higher close one session later
04/18/94... Higher close one session later
07/06/93... Higher close one session later
06/08/93... Higher close one session later
04/23/93... Higher close two sessions later
10/07/92... Higher close one session later
03/30/92... Higher close one session later
01/21/92... Higher close one session later

Despite the 1%+ selloff for the S&P, the NASDAQ remained relatively well bid
Wednesday. When the S&P500 closes down 1%+, the Nasdaq100 (NDX) typically
suffers a similarly large loss given the large number of high beta stocks that
comprise the index. But when the NDX manages to hold its own in the face of a
solid down day for the S&P, it suggests limited selling pressure and/or a
rotational environment. Typically, the market is trading higher three sessions
later. Listed below is every instance since 1990 in which the NDX settled down
less than 0.5% (or managed a gain) on a day when the S&P fell over 1%. Note
that in 22 out of 26 cases, or 82% of the time the S&P was trading at a higher
level three sessions later...

S&P500 Drops 1%+, Nasdaq Down Less than 0.5%
10/08/08... S&P500 ??? three days later
08/12/08... S&P500 +0.7% three days later
07/31/08... S&P500 +1.4% three days later
07/15/08... S&P500 +3.8% three days later
05/23/08... S&P500 +1.6% three days later
06/13/06... S&P500 +2.3% three days later
05/12/05... S&P500 +1.2% three days later
03/09/05... S&P500 -0.0% three days later
04/16/03... S&P500 +3.6% three days later
01/22/03... S&P500 -3.5% three days later (*)
10/09/02... S&P500 +8.3% three days later
09/24/02... S&P500 +1.0% three days later
04/29/02... S&P500 +1.8% three days later
03/06/00... S&P500 +0.8% three days later
02/16/00... S&P500 -2.6% three days later (*)
05/27/99... S&P500 +1.1% three days later
01/14/99... S&P500 +3.7% three days later
07/09/97... S&P500 +1.2% three days later
03/13/97... S&P500 +0.0% three days later
04/10/96... S&P500 +1.4% three days later
02/20/96... S&P500 +2.9% three days later
01/10/96... S&P500 +0.2% three days later
06/24/94... S&P500 +1.1% three days later
04/01/91... S&P500 +2.3% three days later
01/09/91... S&P500 +0.3% three days later
01/02/91... S&P500 -3.4% three days later (*)
07/05/90... S&P500 +0.2% three days later

Putting aside the above study for the moment, it's noteworthy that just about
every one of the recently triggered short-term buy setups currently on the
board will be fulfilled on a close above SPX 996. That would leave the market
in a vulnerable position given the potential for a failed McClellan signal,
which will occur Thursday barring a rally back to the SPX 1053 area. This
would mark only the ninth time since 1970 that a -200 McClellan reading has
failed to lead to a flat-to-up S&P three sessions later. In each of the
previous occurrences, the market struggled over the next week...

NYSE McClellan <-200, S&P Down 0.5% Three Days Later
06/26/08... S&P500 -1.6% one week later
11/12/07... S&P500 -0.4% one week later
07/27/07... S&P500 -1.8% one week later
05/22/06... S&P500 -0.2% one week later
09/02/98... S&P500 -1.0% one week later
07/31/98... S&P500 -2.8% one week later
10/21/87... S&P500 -9.7% one week later
10/25/78... S&P500 -0.5% one week later

Copyright Notice

Copyright 2012 Astrikos LLC. This publication is for the benefit of subscribers only and is not to be summarized, reproduced, or rebroadcast in any fashion without our written permission.

Market Tells is on Twitter!


Disclaimer

Comments, data and trading signals herein are for informational purposes only and are not recommendations to buy or sell. All information presented is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed.