Mar
06

S&P500 Closes at a New 52-week Low on Light Volume

By on Thursday, March 6th, 2008 at 11:30 pm
Stock indexes settled sharply lower Thursday in an extremely lopsided session.
Breadth settled 8:1 in favor of declining issues, and volume associated with
declining issues accounted for over 94% of total volume as buyers were nowhere
to be found. The CBOE equity put/call ratio closed at 1.12, its highest
reading in over three years. While market internals had a panicky feel, it's
noteworthy that big board volume declined - not what you'd expect on a day
when the S&P plunged to a new 52-week low.

There's been a lot of discussion recently about whether the January (closing)
low would hold. Now that it's been broken, at least as far as the S&P500 is
concerned, should we automatically view that bearishly? Perhaps not, at least
for the time being. The fact that volume declined on a 8:1 negative breadth
day triggers the 1-2 day buy setup recently discussed in my February 14th
column. And looking out over the next couple of weeks, there's actually a bias
towards higher prices after a new 52-week low. Over the last thirty years,
there have been 81 sessions in which the S&P settled at its lowest level of
the past year. In 58 cases, or 72% of the time, the S&P was trading higher ten
trading days later. That's better than the 58% at-any-time odds for a higher
S&P two weeks later.

The track record improves noticeably when we only look for those instances in
which NYSE volume declined on the day that the S&P closed at a new low (as
occurred Thursday). The last thirty times this setup has occurred are listed
in the table below. Note that in 27 cases, or 90% of the time, the new 52-week
low ended up leading to higher prices two weeks later...

SPX Closes at New 52-week Low, NYSE Volume Down
03/06/08... S&P ??? two weeks later
10/09/02... S&P +15.4% two weeks later
10/07/02... S&P +14.6% two weeks later
07/22/02... S&P +1.8% two weeks later
07/18/02... S&P +0.4% two weeks later
07/16/02... S&P +0.2% two weeks later
09/20/01... S&P +8.6% two weeks later
09/18/01... S&P +1.8% two weeks later
03/09/01... S&P -7.6% two weeks later
02/23/01... S&P -1.0% two weeks later
11/22/00... S&P +1.6% two weeks later
09/24/90... S&P +2.9% two weeks later
08/22/90... S&P +1.2% two weeks later
12/04/87... S&P +11.3% two weeks later
07/24/84... S&P +10.1% two weeks later
07/23/84... S&P +9.2% two weeks later
05/29/84... S&P +1.3% two weeks later
05/23/84... S&P +1.2% two weeks later
08/11/82... S&P +14.6% two weeks later
08/10/82... S&P +12.2% two weeks later
08/06/82... S&P +9.0% two weeks later
08/04/82... S&P +2.3% two weeks later
07/30/82... S&P -3.0% two weeks later
06/21/82... S&P +0.1% two weeks later
03/08/82... S&P +5.1% two weeks later
03/05/82... S&P +1.2% two weeks later
09/24/81... S&P +6.4% two weeks later
09/18/81... S&P +2.7% two weeks later
03/06/78... S&P +4.5% two weeks later
02/28/78... S&P +2.7% two weeks later
02/22/78... S&P +0.3% two weeks later

Copyright Notice

Copyright 2012 Astrikos LLC. This publication is for the benefit of subscribers only and is not to be summarized, reproduced, or rebroadcast in any fashion without our written permission.

Market Tells is on Twitter!


Disclaimer

Comments, data and trading signals herein are for informational purposes only and are not recommendations to buy or sell. All information presented is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed.